INVE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Apogee Enterprises has a net margin of -92.21% compared to Identiv's net margin of 6.15%. Identiv's return on equity of 83.4% beat Apogee Enterprises's return on equity of 20.18%.

Identiv has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 103.02%. On the other hand Apogee Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $66.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.67%. Given that Identiv has higher upside potential than Apogee Enterprises, analysts believe Identiv is more attractive than Apogee Enterprises.

Identiv has a beta of 1.361, which suggesting that the stock is 36.148% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Apogee Enterprises has a beta of 1.044, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.431%.

Identiv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Apogee Enterprises offers a yield of 1.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Identiv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Apogee Enterprises pays out 21.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Apogee Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Identiv quarterly revenues are $6.5M, which are smaller than Apogee Enterprises quarterly revenues of $341.3M. Identiv's net income of $85.9M is higher than Apogee Enterprises's net income of $21M. Notably, Identiv's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.15x while Apogee Enterprises's PE ratio is 11.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Identiv is 0.69x versus 0.84x for Apogee Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Armstrong World Industries has a net margin of -92.21% compared to Identiv's net margin of 19.89%. Identiv's return on equity of 83.4% beat Armstrong World Industries's return on equity of 39.11%.

Identiv has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 103.02%. On the other hand Armstrong World Industries has an analysts' consensus of $152.25 which suggests that it could grow by 6.72%. Given that Identiv has higher upside potential than Armstrong World Industries, analysts believe Identiv is more attractive than Armstrong World Industries.

Identiv has a beta of 1.361, which suggesting that the stock is 36.148% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.181, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.146%.

Identiv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Armstrong World Industries offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Identiv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Armstrong World Industries pays out 20.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Armstrong World Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Identiv quarterly revenues are $6.5M, which are smaller than Armstrong World Industries quarterly revenues of $386.6M. Identiv's net income of $85.9M is higher than Armstrong World Industries's net income of $76.9M. Notably, Identiv's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.15x while Armstrong World Industries's PE ratio is 25.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Identiv is 0.69x versus 4.52x for Armstrong World Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southland Holdings has a net margin of -92.21% compared to Identiv's net margin of -31.58%. Identiv's return on equity of 83.4% beat Southland Holdings's return on equity of -45.97%.

Identiv has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 103.02%. On the other hand Southland Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29.74%. Given that Identiv has higher upside potential than Southland Holdings, analysts believe Identiv is more attractive than Southland Holdings.

Identiv has a beta of 1.361, which suggesting that the stock is 36.148% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southland Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Identiv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Southland Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Identiv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Southland Holdings pays out -0.57% of its earnings as a dividend.

Identiv quarterly revenues are $6.5M, which are smaller than Southland Holdings quarterly revenues of $173.3M. Identiv's net income of $85.9M is higher than Southland Holdings's net income of -$54.7M. Notably, Identiv's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.15x while Southland Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Identiv is 0.69x versus 0.16x for Southland Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Interface has a net margin of -92.21% compared to Identiv's net margin of 8.26%. Identiv's return on equity of 83.4% beat Interface's return on equity of 19.3%.

Identiv has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 103.02%. On the other hand Interface has an analysts' consensus of $29.67 which suggests that it could grow by 26.89%. Given that Identiv has higher upside potential than Interface, analysts believe Identiv is more attractive than Interface.

Identiv has a beta of 1.361, which suggesting that the stock is 36.148% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Interface has a beta of 2.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.489%.

Identiv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Interface offers a yield of 0.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Identiv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Interface pays out 5.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Interface's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Identiv quarterly revenues are $6.5M, which are smaller than Interface quarterly revenues of $344.3M. Identiv's net income of $85.9M is higher than Interface's net income of $28.4M. Notably, Identiv's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.15x while Interface's PE ratio is 16.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Identiv is 0.69x versus 1.05x for Interface. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.