HTZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DriveItAway Holdings has a net margin of -23.48% compared to Hertz Global Holdings's net margin of -479.76%. Hertz Global Holdings's return on equity of -164.56% beat DriveItAway Holdings's return on equity of --.

Hertz Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.39, signalling downside risk potential of -11.07%. On the other hand DriveItAway Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hertz Global Holdings has higher upside potential than DriveItAway Holdings, analysts believe Hertz Global Holdings is more attractive than DriveItAway Holdings.

Hertz Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DriveItAway Holdings has a beta of -6.369, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 736.93%.

Hertz Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DriveItAway Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hertz Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DriveItAway Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hertz Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than DriveItAway Holdings quarterly revenues of $110.4K. Hertz Global Holdings's net income of -$479M is lower than DriveItAway Holdings's net income of -$529.7K. Notably, Hertz Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DriveItAway Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hertz Global Holdings is 0.13x versus 7.24x for DriveItAway Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Herc Holdings has a net margin of -23.48% compared to Hertz Global Holdings's net margin of -6.08%. Hertz Global Holdings's return on equity of -164.56% beat Herc Holdings's return on equity of 15.48%.

Hertz Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.39, signalling downside risk potential of -11.07%. On the other hand Herc Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $226.11 which suggests that it could grow by 74.9%. Given that Herc Holdings has higher upside potential than Hertz Global Holdings, analysts believe Herc Holdings is more attractive than Hertz Global Holdings.

Hertz Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Herc Holdings has a beta of 2.137, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.672%.

Hertz Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Herc Holdings offers a yield of 2.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Hertz Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Herc Holdings pays out 36.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Herc Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hertz Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Herc Holdings quarterly revenues of $757M. Hertz Global Holdings's net income of -$479M is lower than Herc Holdings's net income of -$46M. Notably, Hertz Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Herc Holdings's PE ratio is 17.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hertz Global Holdings is 0.13x versus 1.09x for Herc Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryder System has a net margin of -23.48% compared to Hertz Global Holdings's net margin of 4.21%. Hertz Global Holdings's return on equity of -164.56% beat Ryder System's return on equity of 15.89%.

Hertz Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.39, signalling downside risk potential of -11.07%. On the other hand Ryder System has an analysts' consensus of $174.22 which suggests that it could grow by 23.86%. Given that Ryder System has higher upside potential than Hertz Global Holdings, analysts believe Ryder System is more attractive than Hertz Global Holdings.

Hertz Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryder System has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.938%.

Hertz Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ryder System offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. Hertz Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System pays out 27.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hertz Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than Ryder System quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Hertz Global Holdings's net income of -$479M is lower than Ryder System's net income of $135M. Notably, Hertz Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ryder System's PE ratio is 12.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hertz Global Holdings is 0.13x versus 0.49x for Ryder System. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

U-Haul Holding has a net margin of -23.48% compared to Hertz Global Holdings's net margin of 4.84%. Hertz Global Holdings's return on equity of -164.56% beat U-Haul Holding's return on equity of 6.1%.

Hertz Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.39, signalling downside risk potential of -11.07%. On the other hand U-Haul Holding has an analysts' consensus of $91.40 which suggests that it could grow by 44.25%. Given that U-Haul Holding has higher upside potential than Hertz Global Holdings, analysts believe U-Haul Holding is more attractive than Hertz Global Holdings.

Hertz Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison U-Haul Holding has a beta of 1.071, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.054%.

Hertz Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. U-Haul Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hertz Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. U-Haul Holding pays out 5.05% of its earnings as a dividend. U-Haul Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hertz Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than U-Haul Holding quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Hertz Global Holdings's net income of -$479M is lower than U-Haul Holding's net income of $67.2M. Notably, Hertz Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while U-Haul Holding's PE ratio is 29.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hertz Global Holdings is 0.13x versus 2.17x for U-Haul Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.