HLNE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

US Global Investors has a net margin of 36.66% compared to Hamilton Lane's net margin of 14.6%. Hamilton Lane's return on equity of 25.11% beat US Global Investors's return on equity of 3.67%.

Hamilton Lane has a consensus price target of $177.17, signalling upside risk potential of 19.76%. On the other hand US Global Investors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hamilton Lane has higher upside potential than US Global Investors, analysts believe Hamilton Lane is more attractive than US Global Investors.

Hamilton Lane has a beta of 1.240, which suggesting that the stock is 23.951% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Global Investors has a beta of 1.832, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.18%.

Hamilton Lane has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.3%. US Global Investors offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Hamilton Lane pays 77.58% of its earnings as a dividend. US Global Investors pays out 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hamilton Lane quarterly revenues are $150M, which are larger than US Global Investors quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Hamilton Lane's net income of $55M is higher than US Global Investors's net income of $315K. Notably, Hamilton Lane's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.09x while US Global Investors's PE ratio is 18.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hamilton Lane is 12.32x versus 3.38x for US Global Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Blue Owl Capital has a net margin of 36.66% compared to Hamilton Lane's net margin of 4.96%. Hamilton Lane's return on equity of 25.11% beat Blue Owl Capital's return on equity of 1.99%.

Hamilton Lane has a consensus price target of $177.17, signalling upside risk potential of 19.76%. On the other hand Blue Owl Capital has an analysts' consensus of $25.33 which suggests that it could grow by 9.01%. Given that Hamilton Lane has higher upside potential than Blue Owl Capital, analysts believe Hamilton Lane is more attractive than Blue Owl Capital.

Hamilton Lane has a beta of 1.240, which suggesting that the stock is 23.951% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blue Owl Capital has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hamilton Lane has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.3%. Blue Owl Capital offers a yield of 2.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Hamilton Lane pays 77.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Blue Owl Capital pays out 456.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Lane's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Blue Owl Capital's is not.

Hamilton Lane quarterly revenues are $150M, which are smaller than Blue Owl Capital quarterly revenues of $600.9M. Hamilton Lane's net income of $55M is higher than Blue Owl Capital's net income of $29.8M. Notably, Hamilton Lane's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.09x while Blue Owl Capital's PE ratio is 757.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hamilton Lane is 12.32x versus 8.08x for Blue Owl Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Principal Financial Group has a net margin of 36.66% compared to Hamilton Lane's net margin of -7.31%. Hamilton Lane's return on equity of 25.11% beat Principal Financial Group's return on equity of -1.82%.

Hamilton Lane has a consensus price target of $177.17, signalling upside risk potential of 19.76%. On the other hand Principal Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $87.92 which suggests that it could grow by 12.24%. Given that Hamilton Lane has higher upside potential than Principal Financial Group, analysts believe Hamilton Lane is more attractive than Principal Financial Group.

Hamilton Lane has a beta of 1.240, which suggesting that the stock is 23.951% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group has a beta of 1.222, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.163%.

Hamilton Lane has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.3%. Principal Financial Group offers a yield of 3.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share. Hamilton Lane pays 77.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group pays out 100.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Lane's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Principal Financial Group's is not.

Hamilton Lane quarterly revenues are $150M, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues of $3B. Hamilton Lane's net income of $55M is higher than Principal Financial Group's net income of -$220M. Notably, Hamilton Lane's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.09x while Principal Financial Group's PE ratio is 15.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hamilton Lane is 12.32x versus 1.32x for Principal Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEI Investments has a net margin of 36.66% compared to Hamilton Lane's net margin of 28.82%. Hamilton Lane's return on equity of 25.11% beat SEI Investments's return on equity of 24.65%.

Hamilton Lane has a consensus price target of $177.17, signalling upside risk potential of 19.76%. On the other hand SEI Investments has an analysts' consensus of $85.60 which suggests that it could grow by 5.06%. Given that Hamilton Lane has higher upside potential than SEI Investments, analysts believe Hamilton Lane is more attractive than SEI Investments.

Hamilton Lane has a beta of 1.240, which suggesting that the stock is 23.951% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEI Investments has a beta of 0.976, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.369%.

Hamilton Lane has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.3%. SEI Investments offers a yield of 1.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Hamilton Lane pays 77.58% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments pays out 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hamilton Lane quarterly revenues are $150M, which are smaller than SEI Investments quarterly revenues of $537.4M. Hamilton Lane's net income of $55M is lower than SEI Investments's net income of $154.9M. Notably, Hamilton Lane's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.09x while SEI Investments's PE ratio is 19.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hamilton Lane is 12.32x versus 5.24x for SEI Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.