GNLN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Local Bounti has a net margin of -93.04% compared to Greenlane Holdings's net margin of -335.16%. Greenlane Holdings's return on equity of -136.7% beat Local Bounti's return on equity of -466.66%.

Greenlane Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5363.58%. On the other hand Local Bounti has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 275.59%. Given that Greenlane Holdings has higher upside potential than Local Bounti, analysts believe Greenlane Holdings is more attractive than Local Bounti.

Greenlane Holdings has a beta of 1.775, which suggesting that the stock is 77.519% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Local Bounti has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Greenlane Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Local Bounti offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenlane Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Local Bounti pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlane Holdings quarterly revenues are $4M, which are smaller than Local Bounti quarterly revenues of $10.2M. Greenlane Holdings's net income of -$3.8M is higher than Local Bounti's net income of -$34.3M. Notably, Greenlane Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Local Bounti's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlane Holdings is 0.03x versus 0.51x for Local Bounti. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pioneer Green Farms has a net margin of -93.04% compared to Greenlane Holdings's net margin of -3784581.4%. Greenlane Holdings's return on equity of -136.7% beat Pioneer Green Farms's return on equity of --.

Greenlane Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5363.58%. On the other hand Pioneer Green Farms has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Greenlane Holdings has higher upside potential than Pioneer Green Farms, analysts believe Greenlane Holdings is more attractive than Pioneer Green Farms.

Greenlane Holdings has a beta of 1.775, which suggesting that the stock is 77.519% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pioneer Green Farms has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Greenlane Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pioneer Green Farms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenlane Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pioneer Green Farms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlane Holdings quarterly revenues are $4M, which are larger than Pioneer Green Farms quarterly revenues of $40. Greenlane Holdings's net income of -$3.8M is lower than Pioneer Green Farms's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Greenlane Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pioneer Green Farms's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlane Holdings is 0.03x versus 186.82x for Pioneer Green Farms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

S&W Seed has a net margin of -93.04% compared to Greenlane Holdings's net margin of -195.32%. Greenlane Holdings's return on equity of -136.7% beat S&W Seed's return on equity of -83.77%.

Greenlane Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5363.58%. On the other hand S&W Seed has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 511.89%. Given that Greenlane Holdings has higher upside potential than S&W Seed, analysts believe Greenlane Holdings is more attractive than S&W Seed.

Greenlane Holdings has a beta of 1.775, which suggesting that the stock is 77.519% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison S&W Seed has a beta of 1.566, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.58%.

Greenlane Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. S&W Seed offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenlane Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. S&W Seed pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlane Holdings quarterly revenues are $4M, which are smaller than S&W Seed quarterly revenues of $8.3M. Greenlane Holdings's net income of -$3.8M is higher than S&W Seed's net income of -$16.2M. Notably, Greenlane Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while S&W Seed's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlane Holdings is 0.03x versus 0.25x for S&W Seed. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

22nd Century Group has a net margin of -93.04% compared to Greenlane Holdings's net margin of -149.44%. Greenlane Holdings's return on equity of -136.7% beat 22nd Century Group's return on equity of -832.63%.

Greenlane Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5363.58%. On the other hand 22nd Century Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 210475.78%. Given that 22nd Century Group has higher upside potential than Greenlane Holdings, analysts believe 22nd Century Group is more attractive than Greenlane Holdings.

Greenlane Holdings has a beta of 1.775, which suggesting that the stock is 77.519% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 22nd Century Group has a beta of 1.500, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.022%.

Greenlane Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 22nd Century Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenlane Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 22nd Century Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlane Holdings quarterly revenues are $4M, which are larger than 22nd Century Group quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Greenlane Holdings's net income of -$3.8M is lower than 22nd Century Group's net income of -$3.8M. Notably, Greenlane Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 22nd Century Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlane Holdings is 0.03x versus 0.01x for 22nd Century Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.