GMGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Electronic Arts has a net margin of -8.31% compared to Golden Matrix Group's net margin of 14.52%. Golden Matrix Group's return on equity of -4.41% beat Electronic Arts's return on equity of 13.97%.

Golden Matrix Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 95.12%. On the other hand Electronic Arts has an analysts' consensus of $161.88 which suggests that it could grow by 12.99%. Given that Golden Matrix Group has higher upside potential than Electronic Arts, analysts believe Golden Matrix Group is more attractive than Electronic Arts.

Golden Matrix Group has a beta of 1.942, which suggesting that the stock is 94.197% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Electronic Arts has a beta of 0.805, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.512%.

Golden Matrix Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Electronic Arts offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Golden Matrix Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Electronic Arts pays out 16.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Electronic Arts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Golden Matrix Group quarterly revenues are $41M, which are smaller than Electronic Arts quarterly revenues of $2B. Golden Matrix Group's net income of -$3.4M is lower than Electronic Arts's net income of $294M. Notably, Golden Matrix Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 814.10x while Electronic Arts's PE ratio is 36.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Matrix Group is 1.54x versus 5.17x for Electronic Arts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GameSquare Holdings has a net margin of -8.31% compared to Golden Matrix Group's net margin of -20.76%. Golden Matrix Group's return on equity of -4.41% beat GameSquare Holdings's return on equity of -115.34%.

Golden Matrix Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 95.12%. On the other hand GameSquare Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $3.33 which suggests that it could grow by 298.72%. Given that GameSquare Holdings has higher upside potential than Golden Matrix Group, analysts believe GameSquare Holdings is more attractive than Golden Matrix Group.

Golden Matrix Group has a beta of 1.942, which suggesting that the stock is 94.197% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GameSquare Holdings has a beta of 1.172, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.152%.

Golden Matrix Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GameSquare Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Matrix Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GameSquare Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Golden Matrix Group quarterly revenues are $41M, which are larger than GameSquare Holdings quarterly revenues of $26.4M. Golden Matrix Group's net income of -$3.4M is higher than GameSquare Holdings's net income of -$5.5M. Notably, Golden Matrix Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 814.10x while GameSquare Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Matrix Group is 1.54x versus 0.19x for GameSquare Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GD Culture Group has a net margin of -8.31% compared to Golden Matrix Group's net margin of --. Golden Matrix Group's return on equity of -4.41% beat GD Culture Group's return on equity of --.

Golden Matrix Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 95.12%. On the other hand GD Culture Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Golden Matrix Group has higher upside potential than GD Culture Group, analysts believe Golden Matrix Group is more attractive than GD Culture Group.

Golden Matrix Group has a beta of 1.942, which suggesting that the stock is 94.197% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GD Culture Group has a beta of 1.617, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.677%.

Golden Matrix Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GD Culture Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Matrix Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GD Culture Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Golden Matrix Group quarterly revenues are $41M, which are larger than GD Culture Group quarterly revenues of --. Golden Matrix Group's net income of -$3.4M is higher than GD Culture Group's net income of -$3.7M. Notably, Golden Matrix Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 814.10x while GD Culture Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Matrix Group is 1.54x versus -- for GD Culture Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Take-Two Interactive Software has a net margin of -8.31% compared to Golden Matrix Group's net margin of -27.01%. Golden Matrix Group's return on equity of -4.41% beat Take-Two Interactive Software's return on equity of -52.65%.

Golden Matrix Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 95.12%. On the other hand Take-Two Interactive Software has an analysts' consensus of $198.26 which suggests that it could grow by 7.09%. Given that Golden Matrix Group has higher upside potential than Take-Two Interactive Software, analysts believe Golden Matrix Group is more attractive than Take-Two Interactive Software.

Golden Matrix Group has a beta of 1.942, which suggesting that the stock is 94.197% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Take-Two Interactive Software has a beta of 0.888, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.25%.

Golden Matrix Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Take-Two Interactive Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Matrix Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Take-Two Interactive Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Golden Matrix Group quarterly revenues are $41M, which are smaller than Take-Two Interactive Software quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Golden Matrix Group's net income of -$3.4M is higher than Take-Two Interactive Software's net income of -$365.5M. Notably, Golden Matrix Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 814.10x while Take-Two Interactive Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Matrix Group is 1.54x versus 5.93x for Take-Two Interactive Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.