GLRE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Everest Group has a net margin of -20.13% compared to Greenlight Capital Re's net margin of -12.85%. Greenlight Capital Re's return on equity of 6.79% beat Everest Group's return on equity of 9.78%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 60.55%. On the other hand Everest Group has an analysts' consensus of $397.88 which suggests that it could grow by 12.67%. Given that Greenlight Capital Re has higher upside potential than Everest Group, analysts believe Greenlight Capital Re is more attractive than Everest Group.

Greenlight Capital Re has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.57% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everest Group has a beta of 0.432, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.807%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Everest Group offers a yield of 2.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Greenlight Capital Re pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group pays out 24.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Greenlight Capital Re quarterly revenues are $136.2M, which are smaller than Everest Group quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Greenlight Capital Re's net income of -$27.4M is higher than Everest Group's net income of -$593M. Notably, Greenlight Capital Re's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.81x while Everest Group's PE ratio is 11.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlight Capital Re is 0.70x versus 0.88x for Everest Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maiden Holdings has a net margin of -20.13% compared to Greenlight Capital Re's net margin of -570.56%. Greenlight Capital Re's return on equity of 6.79% beat Maiden Holdings's return on equity of -101.51%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 60.55%. On the other hand Maiden Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 70.94%. Given that Maiden Holdings has higher upside potential than Greenlight Capital Re, analysts believe Maiden Holdings is more attractive than Greenlight Capital Re.

Greenlight Capital Re has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.57% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maiden Holdings has a beta of 1.596, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.628%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Maiden Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenlight Capital Re pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Maiden Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlight Capital Re quarterly revenues are $136.2M, which are larger than Maiden Holdings quarterly revenues of $27.7M. Greenlight Capital Re's net income of -$27.4M is higher than Maiden Holdings's net income of -$158M. Notably, Greenlight Capital Re's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.81x while Maiden Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlight Capital Re is 0.70x versus 1.33x for Maiden Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oxbridge Re Holdings has a net margin of -20.13% compared to Greenlight Capital Re's net margin of -142.93%. Greenlight Capital Re's return on equity of 6.79% beat Oxbridge Re Holdings's return on equity of -79.13%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 60.55%. On the other hand Oxbridge Re Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 548.86%. Given that Oxbridge Re Holdings has higher upside potential than Greenlight Capital Re, analysts believe Oxbridge Re Holdings is more attractive than Greenlight Capital Re.

Greenlight Capital Re has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.57% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oxbridge Re Holdings has a beta of 1.289, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.887%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oxbridge Re Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenlight Capital Re pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oxbridge Re Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlight Capital Re quarterly revenues are $136.2M, which are larger than Oxbridge Re Holdings quarterly revenues of $205K. Greenlight Capital Re's net income of -$27.4M is lower than Oxbridge Re Holdings's net income of -$293K. Notably, Greenlight Capital Re's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.81x while Oxbridge Re Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlight Capital Re is 0.70x versus 14.63x for Oxbridge Re Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patria Investments has a net margin of -20.13% compared to Greenlight Capital Re's net margin of 36.11%. Greenlight Capital Re's return on equity of 6.79% beat Patria Investments's return on equity of 14.81%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 60.55%. On the other hand Patria Investments has an analysts' consensus of $14.75 which suggests that it could grow by 40.74%. Given that Greenlight Capital Re has higher upside potential than Patria Investments, analysts believe Greenlight Capital Re is more attractive than Patria Investments.

Greenlight Capital Re has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.57% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patria Investments has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Patria Investments offers a yield of 7.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Greenlight Capital Re pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Patria Investments pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlight Capital Re quarterly revenues are $136.2M, which are smaller than Patria Investments quarterly revenues of $157.3M. Greenlight Capital Re's net income of -$27.4M is lower than Patria Investments's net income of $56.8M. Notably, Greenlight Capital Re's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.81x while Patria Investments's PE ratio is 21.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlight Capital Re is 0.70x versus 4.30x for Patria Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.