CDNS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Autodesk has a net margin of 25.09% compared to Cadence Design Systems's net margin of 18.49%. Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 25.78% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 47.41%.

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus price target of $313.67, signalling upside risk potential of 20.38%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $324.88 which suggests that it could grow by 24.61%. Given that Autodesk has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, analysts believe Autodesk is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems.

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.826% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.494, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.404%.

Cadence Design Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cadence Design Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Cadence Design Systems's net income of $340.2M is higher than Autodesk's net income of $303M. Notably, Cadence Design Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 67.50x while Autodesk's PE ratio is 50.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Design Systems is 15.37x versus 9.23x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ansys has a net margin of 25.09% compared to Cadence Design Systems's net margin of 32.05%. Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 25.78% beat Ansys's return on equity of 10.17%.

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus price target of $313.67, signalling upside risk potential of 20.38%. On the other hand Ansys has an analysts' consensus of $352.86 which suggests that it could grow by 16.8%. Given that Cadence Design Systems has higher upside potential than Ansys, analysts believe Cadence Design Systems is more attractive than Ansys.

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.826% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ansys has a beta of 1.202, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.19%.

Cadence Design Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ansys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cadence Design Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ansys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Ansys quarterly revenues of $882.2M. Cadence Design Systems's net income of $340.2M is higher than Ansys's net income of $282.7M. Notably, Cadence Design Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 67.50x while Ansys's PE ratio is 46.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Design Systems is 15.37x versus 10.43x for Ansys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shift4 Payments has a net margin of 25.09% compared to Cadence Design Systems's net margin of 13.08%. Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 25.78% beat Shift4 Payments's return on equity of 23.97%.

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus price target of $313.67, signalling upside risk potential of 20.38%. On the other hand Shift4 Payments has an analysts' consensus of $118.00 which suggests that it could grow by 54.25%. Given that Shift4 Payments has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, analysts believe Shift4 Payments is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems.

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.826% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shift4 Payments has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cadence Design Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shift4 Payments offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cadence Design Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shift4 Payments pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Shift4 Payments quarterly revenues of $887M. Cadence Design Systems's net income of $340.2M is higher than Shift4 Payments's net income of $116M. Notably, Cadence Design Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 67.50x while Shift4 Payments's PE ratio is 24.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Design Systems is 15.37x versus 1.83x for Shift4 Payments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Synopsys has a net margin of 25.09% compared to Cadence Design Systems's net margin of 20.32%. Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 25.78% beat Synopsys's return on equity of 26.4%.

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus price target of $313.67, signalling upside risk potential of 20.38%. On the other hand Synopsys has an analysts' consensus of $607.56 which suggests that it could grow by 43.98%. Given that Synopsys has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, analysts believe Synopsys is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems.

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.826% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Synopsys has a beta of 1.227, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.677%.

Cadence Design Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Synopsys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cadence Design Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Synopsys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Synopsys quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Cadence Design Systems's net income of $340.2M is higher than Synopsys's net income of $295.7M. Notably, Cadence Design Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 67.50x while Synopsys's PE ratio is 31.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Design Systems is 15.37x versus 10.85x for Synopsys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.