AXGN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Electromed has a net margin of 0.91% compared to Axogen's net margin of 12.11%. Axogen's return on equity of -10.21% beat Electromed's return on equity of 15.91%.

Axogen has a consensus price target of $25.71, signalling upside risk potential of 61.83%. On the other hand Electromed has an analysts' consensus of $37.00 which suggests that it could grow by 64.23%. Given that Electromed has higher upside potential than Axogen, analysts believe Electromed is more attractive than Axogen.

Axogen has a beta of 0.995, which suggesting that the stock is 0.462% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Electromed has a beta of 0.594, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.575%.

Axogen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Electromed offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Axogen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Electromed pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Axogen quarterly revenues are $49.4M, which are larger than Electromed quarterly revenues of $16.3M. Axogen's net income of $450K is lower than Electromed's net income of $2M. Notably, Axogen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Electromed's PE ratio is 30.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Axogen is 3.75x versus 3.38x for Electromed. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IRIDEX has a net margin of 0.91% compared to Axogen's net margin of -16.69%. Axogen's return on equity of -10.21% beat IRIDEX's return on equity of -157.91%.

Axogen has a consensus price target of $25.71, signalling upside risk potential of 61.83%. On the other hand IRIDEX has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 112.2%. Given that IRIDEX has higher upside potential than Axogen, analysts believe IRIDEX is more attractive than Axogen.

Axogen has a beta of 0.995, which suggesting that the stock is 0.462% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IRIDEX has a beta of 0.737, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.316%.

Axogen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IRIDEX offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Axogen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IRIDEX pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Axogen quarterly revenues are $49.4M, which are larger than IRIDEX quarterly revenues of $11.6M. Axogen's net income of $450K is higher than IRIDEX's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Axogen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while IRIDEX's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Axogen is 3.75x versus 0.32x for IRIDEX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Myomo has a net margin of 0.91% compared to Axogen's net margin of -2.16%. Axogen's return on equity of -10.21% beat Myomo's return on equity of -48.64%.

Axogen has a consensus price target of $25.71, signalling upside risk potential of 61.83%. On the other hand Myomo has an analysts' consensus of $9.25 which suggests that it could grow by 108.8%. Given that Myomo has higher upside potential than Axogen, analysts believe Myomo is more attractive than Axogen.

Axogen has a beta of 0.995, which suggesting that the stock is 0.462% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Myomo has a beta of 1.548, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.752%.

Axogen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Myomo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Axogen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Myomo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Axogen quarterly revenues are $49.4M, which are larger than Myomo quarterly revenues of $12.1M. Axogen's net income of $450K is higher than Myomo's net income of -$260.1K. Notably, Axogen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Myomo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Axogen is 3.75x versus 5.14x for Myomo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stereotaxis has a net margin of 0.91% compared to Axogen's net margin of -118.53%. Axogen's return on equity of -10.21% beat Stereotaxis's return on equity of -139.2%.

Axogen has a consensus price target of $25.71, signalling upside risk potential of 61.83%. On the other hand Stereotaxis has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could grow by 171.08%. Given that Stereotaxis has higher upside potential than Axogen, analysts believe Stereotaxis is more attractive than Axogen.

Axogen has a beta of 0.995, which suggesting that the stock is 0.462% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stereotaxis has a beta of 1.602, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.223%.

Axogen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stereotaxis offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Axogen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stereotaxis pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Axogen quarterly revenues are $49.4M, which are larger than Stereotaxis quarterly revenues of $6.3M. Axogen's net income of $450K is higher than Stereotaxis's net income of -$7.5M. Notably, Axogen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Stereotaxis's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Axogen is 3.75x versus 5.25x for Stereotaxis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.