AVO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Amcon Distributing has a net margin of 1.17% compared to Mission Produce's net margin of 0.05%. Mission Produce's return on equity of 7.29% beat Amcon Distributing's return on equity of 3.29%.

Mission Produce has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 73.82%. On the other hand Amcon Distributing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mission Produce has higher upside potential than Amcon Distributing, analysts believe Mission Produce is more attractive than Amcon Distributing.

Mission Produce has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amcon Distributing has a beta of 0.536, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.361%.

Mission Produce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amcon Distributing offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Mission Produce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing pays out 14.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mission Produce quarterly revenues are $334.2M, which are smaller than Amcon Distributing quarterly revenues of $711.3M. Mission Produce's net income of $3.9M is higher than Amcon Distributing's net income of $348.4K. Notably, Mission Produce's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.46x while Amcon Distributing's PE ratio is 19.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mission Produce is 0.53x versus 0.03x for Amcon Distributing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sysco has a net margin of 1.17% compared to Mission Produce's net margin of 2.02%. Mission Produce's return on equity of 7.29% beat Sysco's return on equity of 90.07%.

Mission Produce has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 73.82%. On the other hand Sysco has an analysts' consensus of $83.18 which suggests that it could grow by 22.96%. Given that Mission Produce has higher upside potential than Sysco, analysts believe Mission Produce is more attractive than Sysco.

Mission Produce has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sysco has a beta of 0.916, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.424%.

Mission Produce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sysco offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Mission Produce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco pays out 51.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mission Produce quarterly revenues are $334.2M, which are smaller than Sysco quarterly revenues of $20.2B. Mission Produce's net income of $3.9M is lower than Sysco's net income of $406M. Notably, Mission Produce's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.46x while Sysco's PE ratio is 17.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mission Produce is 0.53x versus 0.42x for Sysco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Natural Foods has a net margin of 1.17% compared to Mission Produce's net margin of -0.04%. Mission Produce's return on equity of 7.29% beat United Natural Foods's return on equity of -4.96%.

Mission Produce has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 73.82%. On the other hand United Natural Foods has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.96%. Given that Mission Produce has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, analysts believe Mission Produce is more attractive than United Natural Foods.

Mission Produce has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Natural Foods has a beta of 1.078, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.767%.

Mission Produce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. United Natural Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mission Produce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. United Natural Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mission Produce quarterly revenues are $334.2M, which are smaller than United Natural Foods quarterly revenues of $8.2B. Mission Produce's net income of $3.9M is higher than United Natural Foods's net income of -$3M. Notably, Mission Produce's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.46x while United Natural Foods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mission Produce is 0.53x versus 0.04x for United Natural Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Foods Holding has a net margin of 1.17% compared to Mission Produce's net margin of 0.7%. Mission Produce's return on equity of 7.29% beat US Foods Holding's return on equity of 10.41%.

Mission Produce has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 73.82%. On the other hand US Foods Holding has an analysts' consensus of $79.85 which suggests that it could grow by 32.03%. Given that Mission Produce has higher upside potential than US Foods Holding, analysts believe Mission Produce is more attractive than US Foods Holding.

Mission Produce has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Foods Holding has a beta of 1.383, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.293%.

Mission Produce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. US Foods Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mission Produce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. US Foods Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mission Produce quarterly revenues are $334.2M, which are smaller than US Foods Holding quarterly revenues of $9.5B. Mission Produce's net income of $3.9M is lower than US Foods Holding's net income of $66M. Notably, Mission Produce's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.46x while US Foods Holding's PE ratio is 29.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mission Produce is 0.53x versus 0.39x for US Foods Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.