ASTI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

inTest has a net margin of -19776.22% compared to Ascent Solar Technologies's net margin of 4.11%. Ascent Solar Technologies's return on equity of -12974.47% beat inTest's return on equity of 2.92%.

Ascent Solar Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand inTest has an analysts' consensus of $12.67 which suggests that it could grow by 79.42%. Given that inTest has higher upside potential than Ascent Solar Technologies, analysts believe inTest is more attractive than Ascent Solar Technologies.

Ascent Solar Technologies has a beta of 1.990, which suggesting that the stock is 98.974% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison inTest has a beta of 1.905, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.531%.

Ascent Solar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. inTest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ascent Solar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. inTest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ascent Solar Technologies quarterly revenues are $8.6K, which are smaller than inTest quarterly revenues of $36.6M. Ascent Solar Technologies's net income of -$1.7M is lower than inTest's net income of $1.5M. Notably, Ascent Solar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while inTest's PE ratio is 30.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ascent Solar Technologies is 4.78x versus 0.66x for inTest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NEXTracker has a net margin of -19776.22% compared to Ascent Solar Technologies's net margin of 16.97%. Ascent Solar Technologies's return on equity of -12974.47% beat NEXTracker's return on equity of 49.89%.

Ascent Solar Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NEXTracker has an analysts' consensus of $55.23 which suggests that it could grow by 28.01%. Given that NEXTracker has higher upside potential than Ascent Solar Technologies, analysts believe NEXTracker is more attractive than Ascent Solar Technologies.

Ascent Solar Technologies has a beta of 1.990, which suggesting that the stock is 98.974% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NEXTracker has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ascent Solar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NEXTracker offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ascent Solar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NEXTracker pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ascent Solar Technologies quarterly revenues are $8.6K, which are smaller than NEXTracker quarterly revenues of $679.4M. Ascent Solar Technologies's net income of -$1.7M is lower than NEXTracker's net income of $115.3M. Notably, Ascent Solar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NEXTracker's PE ratio is 11.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ascent Solar Technologies is 4.78x versus 2.32x for NEXTracker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SunEdison, Inc. has a net margin of -19776.22% compared to Ascent Solar Technologies's net margin of --. Ascent Solar Technologies's return on equity of -12974.47% beat SunEdison, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Ascent Solar Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SunEdison, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ascent Solar Technologies has higher upside potential than SunEdison, Inc., analysts believe Ascent Solar Technologies is more attractive than SunEdison, Inc..

Ascent Solar Technologies has a beta of 1.990, which suggesting that the stock is 98.974% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SunEdison, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ascent Solar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SunEdison, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ascent Solar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SunEdison, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ascent Solar Technologies quarterly revenues are $8.6K, which are larger than SunEdison, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Ascent Solar Technologies's net income of -$1.7M is higher than SunEdison, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Ascent Solar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SunEdison, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ascent Solar Technologies is 4.78x versus -- for SunEdison, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zeo Energy has a net margin of -19776.22% compared to Ascent Solar Technologies's net margin of 1.14%. Ascent Solar Technologies's return on equity of -12974.47% beat Zeo Energy's return on equity of 9.69%.

Ascent Solar Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Zeo Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ascent Solar Technologies has higher upside potential than Zeo Energy, analysts believe Ascent Solar Technologies is more attractive than Zeo Energy.

Ascent Solar Technologies has a beta of 1.990, which suggesting that the stock is 98.974% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zeo Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ascent Solar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zeo Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ascent Solar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zeo Energy pays out 83.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Zeo Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ascent Solar Technologies quarterly revenues are $8.6K, which are smaller than Zeo Energy quarterly revenues of $14.7M. Ascent Solar Technologies's net income of -$1.7M is lower than Zeo Energy's net income of $167.2K. Notably, Ascent Solar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zeo Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ascent Solar Technologies is 4.78x versus 0.06x for Zeo Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.