ASTC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Genasys has a net margin of -9641.18% compared to Astrotech's net margin of -168.91%. Astrotech's return on equity of -32.2% beat Genasys's return on equity of -102.17%.

Astrotech has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Genasys has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 105.13%. Given that Genasys has higher upside potential than Astrotech, analysts believe Genasys is more attractive than Astrotech.

Astrotech has a beta of -0.196, which suggesting that the stock is 119.604% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genasys has a beta of 0.514, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.599%.

Astrotech has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genasys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Astrotech pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Genasys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Astrotech quarterly revenues are $34K, which are smaller than Genasys quarterly revenues of $6.7M. Astrotech's net income of -$3.3M is higher than Genasys's net income of -$11.4M. Notably, Astrotech's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Genasys's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astrotech is 8.88x versus 4.80x for Genasys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MIND Technology has a net margin of -9641.18% compared to Astrotech's net margin of 10.67%. Astrotech's return on equity of -32.2% beat MIND Technology's return on equity of 19.13%.

Astrotech has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MIND Technology has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2.7%. Given that MIND Technology has higher upside potential than Astrotech, analysts believe MIND Technology is more attractive than Astrotech.

Astrotech has a beta of -0.196, which suggesting that the stock is 119.604% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MIND Technology has a beta of 1.178, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.754%.

Astrotech has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MIND Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Astrotech pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MIND Technology pays out 345.26% of its earnings as a dividend.

Astrotech quarterly revenues are $34K, which are smaller than MIND Technology quarterly revenues of $12.1M. Astrotech's net income of -$3.3M is lower than MIND Technology's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Astrotech's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MIND Technology's PE ratio is 2.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astrotech is 8.88x versus 0.42x for MIND Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sobr Safe has a net margin of -9641.18% compared to Astrotech's net margin of -3991.43%. Astrotech's return on equity of -32.2% beat Sobr Safe's return on equity of -351.33%.

Astrotech has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sobr Safe has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 37601.65%. Given that Sobr Safe has higher upside potential than Astrotech, analysts believe Sobr Safe is more attractive than Astrotech.

Astrotech has a beta of -0.196, which suggesting that the stock is 119.604% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sobr Safe has a beta of 0.675, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.479%.

Astrotech has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sobr Safe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Astrotech pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sobr Safe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Astrotech quarterly revenues are $34K, which are smaller than Sobr Safe quarterly revenues of $46.1K. Astrotech's net income of -$3.3M is lower than Sobr Safe's net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Astrotech's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sobr Safe's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astrotech is 8.88x versus 1.44x for Sobr Safe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Teledyne Technologies has a net margin of -9641.18% compared to Astrotech's net margin of 18.15%. Astrotech's return on equity of -32.2% beat Teledyne Technologies's return on equity of 10.21%.

Astrotech has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Teledyne Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $502.91 which suggests that it could grow by 14.11%. Given that Teledyne Technologies has higher upside potential than Astrotech, analysts believe Teledyne Technologies is more attractive than Astrotech.

Astrotech has a beta of -0.196, which suggesting that the stock is 119.604% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Teledyne Technologies has a beta of 1.009, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.87299999999999%.

Astrotech has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Teledyne Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Astrotech pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teledyne Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Astrotech quarterly revenues are $34K, which are smaller than Teledyne Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Astrotech's net income of -$3.3M is lower than Teledyne Technologies's net income of $262M. Notably, Astrotech's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Teledyne Technologies's PE ratio is 23.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astrotech is 8.88x versus 4.03x for Teledyne Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.