AGFY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Art's-Way Manufacturing has a net margin of -1130.87% compared to Agrify's net margin of 13.48%. Agrify's return on equity of -1185.63% beat Art's-Way Manufacturing's return on equity of 2.68%.

Agrify has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5010.73%. On the other hand Art's-Way Manufacturing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 354.55%. Given that Agrify has higher upside potential than Art's-Way Manufacturing, analysts believe Agrify is more attractive than Art's-Way Manufacturing.

Agrify has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Art's-Way Manufacturing has a beta of 0.524, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.637%.

Agrify has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Art's-Way Manufacturing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Agrify pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Art's-Way Manufacturing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Agrify quarterly revenues are $2.2M, which are smaller than Art's-Way Manufacturing quarterly revenues of $6.2M. Agrify's net income of -$24.4M is lower than Art's-Way Manufacturing's net income of $831.9K. Notably, Agrify's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Art's-Way Manufacturing's PE ratio is 30.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agrify is 2.17x versus 0.32x for Art's-Way Manufacturing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CEA Industries has a net margin of -1130.87% compared to Agrify's net margin of -189.45%. Agrify's return on equity of -1185.63% beat CEA Industries's return on equity of -26.82%.

Agrify has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5010.73%. On the other hand CEA Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Agrify has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, analysts believe Agrify is more attractive than CEA Industries.

Agrify has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CEA Industries has a beta of 0.763, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.663%.

Agrify has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CEA Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Agrify pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CEA Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Agrify quarterly revenues are $2.2M, which are larger than CEA Industries quarterly revenues of $390.8K. Agrify's net income of -$24.4M is lower than CEA Industries's net income of -$740.4K. Notably, Agrify's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CEA Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agrify is 2.17x versus 2.25x for CEA Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a net margin of -1130.87% compared to Agrify's net margin of -46.93%. Agrify's return on equity of -1185.63% beat Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity of -25.85%.

Agrify has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5010.73%. On the other hand Hydrofarm Holdings Group has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could grow by 225.58%. Given that Agrify has higher upside potential than Hydrofarm Holdings Group, analysts believe Agrify is more attractive than Hydrofarm Holdings Group.

Agrify has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Agrify has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hydrofarm Holdings Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Agrify pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hydrofarm Holdings Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Agrify quarterly revenues are $2.2M, which are smaller than Hydrofarm Holdings Group quarterly revenues of $37.3M. Agrify's net income of -$24.4M is lower than Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net income of -$17.5M. Notably, Agrify's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hydrofarm Holdings Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agrify is 2.17x versus 0.05x for Hydrofarm Holdings Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban-gro has a net margin of -1130.87% compared to Agrify's net margin of -13.78%. Agrify's return on equity of -1185.63% beat Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43%.

Agrify has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5010.73%. On the other hand Urban-gro has an analysts' consensus of $3.57 which suggests that it could grow by 654.85%. Given that Agrify has higher upside potential than Urban-gro, analysts believe Agrify is more attractive than Urban-gro.

Agrify has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban-gro has a beta of 1.652, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.174%.

Agrify has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban-gro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Agrify pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban-gro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Agrify quarterly revenues are $2.2M, which are smaller than Urban-gro quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Agrify's net income of -$24.4M is lower than Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Agrify's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Urban-gro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agrify is 2.17x versus 0.10x for Urban-gro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.